Friday, September 2, 2016

Star Spangled Outrage

Can we have an adult discussion about the national anthem without everyone getting all pissy about it? I understand that the sight of the stars and bars means different things to different people. Some accept it as a symbol of the United States while others don't get the symbolism and revere a brightly decorated polyester stretch of fabric right up there with the Bible. I was taught in the Boy Scouts that the flag had to receive special treatment. It had to be folded a certain way and if it touched the ground, the proper response was to burn it, which makes the topic of flag-burning more complex. We were also taught from infancy that when the National Anthem was played to remove any head coverings and stand with either one hand over your heart or both by your side. While some people have deeply-held convictions that soldiers bled and died for that flag, others believe just as strongly that soldiers died to protect the freedom to protest, even if it includes the flag. If you love the Second Amendment you have to respect the First. But just let one professional athlete remain seated while the anthem is played and social media explodes in anger and outrage. We have hurricanes, wildfires, zika, and a lunatic running for president, and people are upset because a football player chose not to stand?

The latest in the saga of San Fransisco Forty-Niners' quarterback Colin Kaepernick's objection to standing for the anthem occurred at a pre-season game in San Diego, and who doesn't love a pre-season game? San Diego was celebrating its 28th annual "Salute to the Military," with over two-hundred servicemen and women presenting a "super flag" while color guards from all four branches of the military presented the regular sized one. If that weren't enough jingoism for you, they played the repugnant and nausea producing Lee Greenwood song, "Proud to be an American," with the stadium joining in. Even George M. Cohan thought it was a bit over the top.Then came Kaepernick's gesture and the crowd erupted in rage. Kaepernick was lustily booed louder than an illegal immigrant at a Trump rally. He explained his singular act as a way to protest racial oppression and the near monthly killing of unarmed black men by the police. "I'm not anti-American," Kaepernick said, "I love America...I want to help make (it) better." Something about the public anger reminded me of the days when certain people expressed their patriotism by putting "Love it or leave it" bumper stickers on their trucks and flag decals in their windows. This is not the first time that this nation's patriotic symbols have been appropriated by reactionaries and war hawks. Sometimes, it takes more courage to protest against what you believe to be unjust than to run to join the lynch mob.

From a songwriter's point of view, the National Anthem just isn't that great of a song. First, Francis Scott Key merely wrote a poem in 1814 called the "Defense of Fort McHenry," while captive on a British ship watching the bombardment of Baltimore. Only later was the poem conjoined with a British drinking ditty called, "The Anacreontic Song," whose last verse offered a toast, "with the myrtle of Venus with Bacchus' vine." It wasn't declared the National Anthem until the Hoover administration in 1931. You've seen those ads that say, "Send us your poem and for a nominal fee, we'll put it to music." I knew guys in Nashville that ran that scam for years and it never produced a single good song. If F.S. Key had sent his poem to Nashville, it might have been difficult to put a peppy melody to his third verse, which reads in part, "Their blood has wash'd out their foul footsteps' pollution/No refuge could save the hireling and the slave/From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave." Historians agree that Key, a slave-owner himself, was expressing his revenge over the deaths of freed slaves who fought with the British. We usually skip that verse.

I never understood why they play the National Anthem before sporting events in the first place. And why do different sports get to pick and choose who plays it. Football, baseball, and basketball all do, but you've never heard the anthem before tee-off time in professional golf. At Churchill Downs they sing "My Old Kentucky Home." At the Preakness they sing "Maryland, my Maryland," and at the Belmont Stakes they belt out Sinatra singing "New York, New York." During the recent Rio Olympics, after the first ten medal ceremonies, I started to mute the "Star Spangled Banner." I mean, how many times can you hear the same song in a row? I like "Uptown Funk," but I don't want to hear it played fifteen consecutive times. Is muting the National Anthem worse than sitting for it? I'll bet all the incensed trolls who stormed social media were sitting on their asses too. Just because you're in the Barcalounger in your underwear, why shouldn't you stand for the anthem? These days, the "Star Spangled Banner" has merely become a vehicle for aspiring pop stars to demonstrate their vocal pyrotechnics and attitude. (See Christina Aguilera). The three greatest versions of the song are by Jimi Hendrix, Whitney Houston, and Marvin Gaye. In fact, YouTube "Marvin Gaye, 1983 NBA All-Star game." Since I respect freedom of expression, I stand with Kaepernick sitting. "America the Beautiful" should be the National Anthem anyway. If you lovers of tradition want something to really get mad about, be upset that the uber-patriotic "God Bless America," has replaced "Take Me Out to the Ballgame" during the seventh-inning stretch.












8 comments:

  1. I love reading your words, RJ. True. Yours, the only slightly muted tones of the appropriately focused righteous indignation...right anger in the day when zombies are truly in the street slobbering in large enough quantities to start to really glue up the works of rationality. And you know as well as I do that you just can't trust a zombie, and worse yet, large groups of them.....no good.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If America the Beautiful is chosen to be played anywhere, they should play a recording by Ray Charles. No one else should ever sing that song again. Nobody ever has or ever will do it more justice than Ray.

    As far as Kaepernick, it doesn't even register with me. It is a total non issue. Too many real problems to worry or get upset over. Our country is so divided, it just might be so broken as to never ever be fixed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Honestly I do not care if anyone does or does not stand, bow, wink, blink, or nod during the anthem or the raising of the flag. This incident reminds me of years ago when my private mostly white all female high school took us on a trip to Natchez, MS. We attended some ceremonial reenactment of some battle and they played "Dixie" while bringing in the Rebel flag... I refused to stand, mostly because I HATED being told what to do, but also because the flag represented an attitude that I NEVER had.
    After WWII Germany was not allowed to show overt displays of national pride. Flag worship, song worship, demagogue worship...it is ALL the same and it leads to no good..SYMBOLS have nothing to do with a person's heart or attitude and should not be worshiped.
    About this young man standing or not standing...at LEAST he took a stand. Agree with him or not... AT LEAST HE DID SOMETHING.
    And as my father said to my high school headmaster when called in to discuss my disobedience over not standing during "Dixie"..
    "My lord, don't you people have anything else to worry about"

    My thoughts are closer to Stephen Colbert's "I was just shocked that something interesting happened during a pre-season game"

    American "patriots"...get over yourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The more I think about Kaepernick's response, I agree with him. Blacks in this country have always been treated as inferior, and we whites just don't get it. I admire him!

    ReplyDelete
  5. loved your comment about "lunatic running for president". Bet you've gotten a ton of sexist comments about that one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am a combat vet from the Vietnam era. My service was so that citizens of our great country could have the freedom to choose how they express their patriotism. If someone doesn't want to stand for the anthem because of a belief that it represents suppression, it is that individual's choice, and we should all respect the exercising of that right. Don't have to agree with the action, do have to respect the action.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is truly amazing how we so agree on volatile issues, RJ. Maybe your tutoring of me in high school rubbed off on social issues.

    I hope you had a chance to read my take on this topic....though it was a bit more clumsy and less eloquently stated. I, too, wonder why the national anthem is played at "some" sporting events. "Secular Talk" has a guy who really nailed it, saying what if you were an accountant and your boss said before you "hit the books" each morning, you had to stand for the national anthem...

    I will say that Colin K. devised a poor choice for his vehicle .... that is, his choice of antics to call attention to his "protest' issue.

    Just from a survival point of view, to put your "gig" on the line (a gig that is incredibly over paid and short-lived) is stupid, first of all. You have millions of dollars to hire placard waving protesters and take out ads, etc., and the first thing to do is gather up prominent African-Americans in a group and ask for an audience with the president (hey, guess what...he's African-American...well, half, anyway).

    So, with my eclectic group of right and left smart and dumb followers, I will post this...it's another gem of yours. Not sure if you've gotten this one suggestion; but, separate your paragraphs or indent....it makes your articles easier to read... Love ya, boss...keep up the great journalistic work...always a pleasure reading "The Haspel"...lol.

    ReplyDelete